Ballot Issues in Arkansas

Just when you think you know something, it’s time to examine the facts. I have spent several hours actually reading, researching and calling Arkansas legislators to get the FACTS on the ballot issues that face Arkansans on Nov 2nd .

This post is an attempt to give people the information gleaned as a result. I hope you will read this information, do your own research and then pass it on. Knowledge is power, but only when shared!
The three issues are located at this link where you can read the entire bill if you wish. My personal findings are found below.
http://www.votenaturally.org/2010_ballot_issues.html
Additionally this link provides the most objective information I could find.
http://ppc.uaex.edu/ballot/default.htm

Issue No. 1
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 3 IS TO
AMEND THE ARKANSAS CONSTITUTION TO PROVIDE FOR
A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HUNT, FISH, TRAP, AND
HARVEST WILDLIFE.

Issue No. 1 to my knowledge is cut and dry, it gives the citizens of
Arkansas the Constitutional right to hunt, fish, trap and harvest
wildlife. I encourage you to go to the Public Policy Center link for more details.

[UPDATE]~ There has been some concern expressed over Issue #1 and how it reads, using the word "regulation" One school of thought I have seen expressed from different points of view is if you don't understand it or like the way it is written vote no~

Issue No. 2
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 1004
PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF
ARKANSAS CONCERNING THE INTEREST RATE LIMITS.

This is the one to make blood shoot from your eyes. On its face (if it had only one) this amendment would boil down to: Do I stand on the foundation of free markets and individual liberties or not? The way I understand this is it will allow business owners to charge up to 17 percent on lines of credit. While I believe this is excessive, people also do not have to purchase their goods from merchants who charge this rate.

The challenge is there are 5 caveats to this ONE issue, which may explain why there has been a lawsuit filed against it even being placed on the ballot. “A challenge to Arkansas Issue 2 was filed with the Arkansas Supreme Court opposing the measure and asking the court to take the issue off of the November ballot. The lawsuit argues that the measure violates single-subject law and that the proposal combines three separate issues into one measure, sidestepping the limit on Arkansas Legislature to refer only up to three measures in an election year.” (http://ow.ly/2U2tc) No wonder it’s such a challenge to understand and explain.

Since this post was made on BallotPedia, there have been two more issues added.

Currently merchants of higher-end goods such as furniture and appliances are not able to offer in-house lending. Instead, they must send credit customers out of state, putting Arkansas businesses at a disadvantage and diverting that interest revenue to other states. For instance, if you go to buy furniture and you want to finance it, the seller today must solicit your loan from an out- of- state lender or lose money on the loan because our interest rate is capped so low. If not for all the gook all jam-stuffed into this one it might be a different story, but it usurps the Arkansas Constitution.

For more details see Public Policy Center

Issue No. 3
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 1007
TO AMEND AMENDMENT 82 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF
ARKANSAS TO AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO
ESTABLISH CRITERIA BEFORE AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYERS
PLANNING AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT.

This Issue No.3, in my opinion, expands the role of government in the private sector and creates a “slush fund” for legislators. Under Amendment 82, the State of Arkansas already can issue bonds for the purpose of providing infrastructure and other needs to attract companies that plan to invest a minimum of $500 million dollars and hire a minimum of 500 new employees. This was used in the case of a wind turbine business, LM Glasfiber that came to Arkansas in 2007, but has yet to fulfill the obligations set forth in the Amendment. As a matter of fact this company promised to have 1000 employees in the first 5 years and at the three year mark has less than 300, having two layoffs in 2009 and has only invested to date $95 million. Yet, Arkansans have spent $14,900,000.00 tax payer dollars though funds and grants giving “incentives” to LM Glasfiber to come to our state. And just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse this company has a “27-year exemption from the state corporate income tax.”

This “amendment to the amendment” would set the bar lower, thereby allowing legislators to give bonds to businesses at their discretion to attract them to Arkansas. In my view this also is an attempt to gain more control of who comes and who goes. The advocates for this issue say it will help draw businesses to our state. My thoughts: If we lower our tax rates on businesses (Arkansas today is ranked a woeful 40th in the nation for business tax climate) and stop regulating them to death, then the free markets will naturally attract businesses here. The primary reason we are avoided now is because of our onerous tax burdens.

Allowing legislators the power to decide “winners and losers” in the free market, while knowing that Arkansas continues to experience revenue shortfalls and budget restrictions and being the nation’s 12th fastest growing state growing in debt, it’s a step in the wrong direction for Arkansas to give new authority to increase debt.

For more details see Public Policy Center